Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
Date
Msg-id 15666.1010091097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?  (Katona Gabor <katonag@dragon.klte.hu>)
List pgsql-sql
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> I assume you want to reference id, so you'd need to do something like:

> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t_id_key ON t(id);

Do we allow that (defining an index on a view)?  [ tries it ]
Apparently so :-(

I would argue that this should be disallowed, since it does not do
anything useful and can only mislead people into thinking that it
has some effect.

> This is a hacky sort of way to do it (we allow you to make the internal
> form that a unique constraint has via create index even on views which
> I don't believe would ever be used :( ) and may not continue working
> forever.

Since triggers on a view won't do anything either, I don't see how one
could expect REFERENCES to a view to work.  The system ought to reject
all this stuff as unimplemented.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: How to union tables and have a field with UNIQUE constraint?
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: pltcl function -> plpgsql