> I would argue that this should be disallowed, since it does not do
> anything useful and can only mislead people into thinking that it
> has some effect.
>
> Since triggers on a view won't do anything either, I don't see how one
> could expect REFERENCES to a view to work. The system ought to reject
> all this stuff as unimplemented.
OK, I understand the problem with referencing a view and I changed my code
to use CREATE TABLE AS instead of a view (the created table will change very
rarely, so I'll update it then via a trigger). Is this way ok now and will
work until the end of time :) ? And thanks for the answers.
Gabor Katona
