Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> * The jentry representation should be changed so it's possible to get the type
> of a entry without checking individual types. That'll make code like
> findJsonbValueFromSuperHeader() (well, whatever you've renamed it to)
> much easier to read. Preferrably so it an have the same values (after
> shifting/masking) ask the JBE variants. And it needs space for futher
> types (or representations thereof).
Further types? What further types? JSON seems unlikely to grow any
other value types than what it's got.
regards, tom lane
