Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSKrV5kDEtpWf0T3zRMdADqiMp5sxX=4mXnHwxsXGygJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> *) raising shared buffers does not 'give more memory to postgres for
>> caching' -- it can only reduce it via double paging
>
> That's absolutely not a necessary consequence. If pages are in s_b for a
> while the OS will be perfectly happy to throw them away.

The biggest problem with double buffering is not that it wastes
memory. Rather, it's that it wastes memory bandwidth. I think that
lessening that problem will be the major benefit of making larger
shared_buffers settings practical.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: making bgworkers without shmem access actually not have shmem access
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation