Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
Date
Msg-id 1532199.1609113259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> Now, the behavior of  SELECT INTO is behind the assign statement and this
> fact should be documented. Usually we don't need to use array's fields
> here, but somebody can try it.

It's been behind all along --- this patch didn't really change that.
But I don't mind documenting it more clearly.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Cache relation sizes?