Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-11-21 03:12:14 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
>> ... I'm
>> increasingly using an affected compiler, because it builds twice as quickly as
>> today's gcc.
> No objections to the patch itself, but this seems like quite the odd
> approach. Sure those old compilers might be a bit faster, but they also
> report many fewer legitimate warnings and such.
> A full tree doesn't take that long? A full recompile sess than 40s here
> and src/backend alone is much faster. ISTM that if it's currently too
> slow, improving the concurrency of the build a bit more is a wiser
> path...
As far as that goes, ccache is a miracle worker. But I don't know
how well it works on Windows :-(
regards, tom lane
