[GENERAL] optimize pg_tables query ( text vs varchar ) ...why ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From gmb
Subject [GENERAL] optimize pg_tables query ( text vs varchar ) ...why ?
Date
Msg-id 1502887286235-5978592.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] optimize pg_tables query ( text vs varchar ) ...why ?  (vinny <vinny@xs4all.nl>)
Re: [GENERAL] optimize pg_tables query ( text vs varchar ) ...why ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Hi
For DDL purposes we make significant use of pg_catalog tables/views.
Were investigating performance issues in a typical function:

CREATE FUNCTION tableexists( s TEXT , t TEXT ) returns boolean as
$$
  SELECT count(tablename) = 1 FROM pg_tables WHERE schemaname=$1 and
tablename=$2;
$$
language sql

When change the params of above function to VARCHAR (instead of TEXT),
performance improved dramatically.
We then changed params to NAME ( as per pg_tables column type ) , but the
performance stayed more or less the same.

Can somebody explain this to me ? Is there a better way in which to handle
these ?
(This will be implemented on most object in the catalog e.g. columns,
sequences, functions, etc )

Regards
gmb



--
View this message in context:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/optimize-pg-tables-query-text-vs-varchar-why-tp5978592.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_column_size strange result...