Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Achilleas Mantzios
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question
Date
Msg-id 5c025255-5e48-7b2e-7dec-37c5b939cf66@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question  (Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question  (Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au>)
Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question  (Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
On 16/08/2017 13:46, Alex Samad wrote:


On 16 August 2017 at 16:16, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au> wrote:
> 1) why did it fill up this time and not previously
> I add this
> archive_command = '/bin/true'
> wal_keep_segments = 1000 # <<< I'm guessing its this
>
> 2) how do I fix up, can I just remove the files from the pg_xlog directory

Don't do that. those files are managed by Postgres so you may finish
with a corrupted cluster. Instead you should lower the value of

Too late, its okay its a learning experience.
 
wal_keep_segments, reload the server parameters, and then enforce two
checkpoints to force WAL segments to be recycled. Note that this

how do I force check points
checkpoint ;
(the ; is not meant as a smiley or whatever )
 
depends also on the values of checkpoint_segments
(max_wal_size/min_wal_size in Postgres 9.5 and onwards).
--
Michael

thanks


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alex Samad
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Begginers question
Next
From: gmb
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] optimize pg_tables query ( text vs varchar ) ...why ?