Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emrul
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN
Date
Msg-id 1499107611346-5969860.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Yes, for the example given in the Reddit post I would tend to agree.  This is
one of those issues where for the most part the solution is better naming
conventions but for the few instances where this isn't possible it is a
right pain.




--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Revisiting-NAMEDATALEN-tp5969858p5969860.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind