Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Neil Anderson
Subject Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma
Date
Msg-id 14943ebd-1042-f331-2589-f1690a0786f4@postgrescompare.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On 2018-02-15 1:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?PG_Doc_comments_form?= <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
>> See the example from the documentation for CREATE TABLE below. There should
>> be a comma before the CONSTRAINT keyword.
> 
>> CREATE TABLE distributors (
>>      did     integer,
>>      name    varchar(40)
>>      CONSTRAINT con1 CHECK (did > 100 AND name <> '')
>> );
> 
> Hmm ... that example is legal syntax as-is, but considering that the
> explanation for it says specifically that it's table-constraint syntax
> not column-constraint syntax, I think you're right.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> 

Oh yeah! You're right, strictly speaking it does work. I guess I read it 
as a table constraint because it's on the next line.


-- 
Neil Anderson
neil@postgrescompare.com
http://www.postgrescompare.com

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: i think there's a typo