Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Did you like my idea of?
> statement: <protocol execute> ...
No.
> I want to keep the "statement:" prefix for scripts
> that process our log files, and because it is output by log_statement,
> which controls protocol output as well.
I think that's an irrelevant consideration, but it's driving you
to insist on unnecessarily complicated, confusing output. What's
wrong with "parse:", "bind:", and "execute:"? If you really must
have the word "statement" in there, then let's do "parse statement:"
"bind statement:" and "execute statement:". In any case we've got
to drop all the brackets and braces, they look too much like they might
be part of the statement string.
regards, tom lane
