Re: should I post the patch as committed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: should I post the patch as committed?
Date
Msg-id 14604.1271781048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to should I post the patch as committed?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should I post the patch as committed?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Bruce suggested to me off-list that when I commit a patch with
> revisions, I ought to attach the committed patch to the email in which
> I say that I have committed it.  I know that Bruce habitually does
> this, but I've never found it very helpful, since I prefer to look at
> the patch either using the pgsql-committers emails or the git
> respository.

I quite agree --- people who want to read the committed patch are going
to go to the source, not to what somebody claims he committed.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation