Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation
Date
Msg-id 201004201627.o3KGR3003252@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Oleg, Teodor, would you look at this? ?I see the same behavior in 9.0.
> 
> As there has been no movement on this I think we should punt this from:
> 
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
> 
> to
> 
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo

Agreed, though I am disappointed because I thought Oleg and Teodor were
going to look at this bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> ...Robert
> 
> > Alexey Bashtanov wrote:
> >>
> >> The following bug has been logged online:
> >>
> >> Bug reference: ? ? ?4887
> >> Logged by: ? ? ? ? ?Alexey Bashtanov
> >> Email address: ? ? ?bashtanov@imap.cc
> >> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1, 8.3.7
> >> Operating system: ? Linux 2.6.20 FC5 i686, Linux 2.6.27 FC10 i686
> >> Description: ? ? ? ?inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not
> >> conforming to documentation
> >> Details:
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> '!a|b'::tsquery <@ 'a|b'::tsquery evaluates to false, but should evalueate
> >> to true
> >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-textsearch.html
> >> says "The tsquery containment operators consider only the lexemes listed in
> >> the two queries, ignoring the combining operators.")
> >>
> >> I think negation operator is treated as a lexeme. So please correct the
> >> behaviour of operators or rewrite this line of docs.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> ?Alexey
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
> >> To make changes to your subscription:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
> >
> > --
> > ?Bruce Momjian ?<bruce@momjian.us> ? ? ? ?http://momjian.us
> > ?EnterpriseDB ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://enterprisedb.com
> > ?PG East: ?http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
> > ?+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
> >

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: perltidy
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: should I post the patch as committed?