Re: Split-up ECPG patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Date
Msg-id 14477.1249837782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Split-up ECPG patches  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Split-up ECPG patches  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> around nontrivial expressions.  So I'd like to see an actual case made
>> that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.

> I guess there's only one, compatibility. 

Yeah.  Are there any other precompilers that actively reject FROM/IN
here?  If we're just a bit more strict than they are, it's not as bad
as if there is no common syntax subset.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha releases: How to tag