Re: Split-up ECPG patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203937EAF@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Split-up ECPG patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So I'd like to see an actual case made
>>> that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.
>>
>> I guess there's only one, compatibility.
>
> Yeah.  Are there any other precompilers that actively reject FROM/IN
> here?  If we're just a bit more strict than they are, it's not as bad
> as if there is no common syntax subset.

Oracle:

http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28427/pc_afemb.htm#i9340

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2PC state files on shared memory
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support