Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 1428.1346688964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I am working on an additional enhancement that also pulls the live
> cluster's port number from the postmaster.pid file.  I am attaching the
> part of my patch that was modified to add that feature.  This allows
> live checks without requiring any port numbers to be specified.  Let me
> know if you would like me to email you that merged into your patch, if
> you want it for 9.2.

That seems like a reasonable idea, but how are we going to go about
merging the various proposed patches here?  Do you want me to commit
what I've got, and then you can rebase this port change on that?

As far as 9.2 vs HEAD goes, I think we should try to converge 9.2 and
HEAD as closely as possible, just for our own sanity in future
back-patching.  Right now I think the only necessary difference is
the int64-XLogRecPtr changes in HEAD.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade