Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Steve Howe
Subject Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date
Msg-id 142160089997.20020906235247@carcass.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Bruce,

Friday, September 6, 2002, 10:58:13 PM, you wrote:

BM> Well, there was a big discussion, and I did bring up the issue in early
BM> August to see if I could get a resolution to it and was told no
BM> conclusion could be made.

BM> I suggest you read the TODO detail on the item and make a proposal on
BM> how it _should_ work and if you can get agreement from everyone, you may
BM> be able to nag someone into doing a patch.
I think it should return the number of rows modified in the context of
the view, and not exactly that of each of the tables affected. And
this would not work well with PQcmdStatus() because it returns a
single integer entry only.

This was working on some previous build, wasn't it ? What was the
previous behavior ? Shouldn't the patch follow that way ?

------------- 
Best regards,Steve Howe                           mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Next
From: ljguo_1234
Date:
Subject: Operator startegies for an access method