Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id 1414831.1600210837@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
>> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.

> Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.

Yeah, it did show up here too, about an hour after I pushed the tag.
The last several taggings have been delayed similarly, and I think
at least one never was reported at all.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers