Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=2GDms4mBm2JxM8ysC9fmNCBGxLKAGK0a+JoOtUvKASA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.

Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix