rohtodeveloper wrote
> So how to deal with this kind of situation if I want a implicit
> conversion?
As of the out-of-support 8.3 release many of the implicit casts previously
defined have been changed to explicit casts. It is a catalog change -
obviously, since you can still define implicit casts - so if you absolutely
must have the pre-existing cast be implicit you can modify the catalog
directly.
You may wish to describe why you think this is the solution you need - with
implicit casting there are generally more downsides that upsides.
Dave
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Would-you-help-to-review-our-modifications-tp5823666p5823679.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
