Re: Permanent settings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Permanent settings
Date
Msg-id 14110.1203533026@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Permanent settings  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Permanent settings
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:27:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For the point-and-drool crowd that can't cope with editing a text file,
>> perhaps the best avenue to having a GUI is to build it atop the
>> just-mentioned facility, namely
>> 
>> 1. suck out the current settings.
>> 2. provide a GUI that manipulates the values.
>> 3. write back an entirely new postgresql.conf that doesn't take any
>> trouble to preserve what was there before.

> That's what we have now, and it basically forces each frontend to do the
> implementatino themselevs. E.g. pgadmin has one implementation, phppgadmin
> has another implementation, apparantly Greg has one implementation, there
> may be third party ones out there with their own implementation.

> The point is we need one implementatino that's in the server, because that
> takes away redundancy and it makes it easier to maintain.

The main part of that is the GUI, which is certainly not going to be in
the server, so I fail to see exactly what you think you're really
gaining.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Permanent settings
Next
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Permanent settings