Svenne Krap <svenne@krap.dk> writes:
> create view ord_institutes_sum as
> SELECT ord_property_type_all.dataset_id, ord_property_type_all.nb_property_type_id, 0 AS institut,
sum(ord_property_type_all.amount)AS amount
> FROM ord_property_type_all
> GROUP BY ord_property_type_all.dataset_id, ord_property_type_all.nb_property_type_id;
> create view ord_result_pct as
> SELECT t1.dataset_id, t1.nb_property_type_id, t1.institut, t1.amount / t2.amount * 100::numeric AS pct
> FROM ord_property_type_all t1, ord_institutes_sum t2
> WHERE t1.dataset_id = t2.dataset_id AND t1.nb_property_type_id = t2.nb_property_type_id;
This is really pretty horrid code: you're requesting double evaluation
of the ord_property_type_all view, and then joining the two calculations
to each other. No, the planner will not detect how silly this is :-(,
nor will it realize that there's guaranteed to be a match for every row
--- I believe the latter is the reason for the serious misestimation
that Steinar noted. The misestimation doesn't hurt particularly when
evaluating ord_result_pct by itself, because there are no higher-level
decisions to make ... but it hurts a lot when you join ord_result_pct to
some other stuff.
It seems like there must be a way to get the percentage amounts with
only one evaluation of ord_property_type_all, but I'm not seeing it
right offhand.
regards, tom lane
