Re: pg_stat_activity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Johnston
Subject Re: pg_stat_activity
Date
Msg-id 1396468184822-5798390.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_activity  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Jeff Janes wrote
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Bala Venkat <

> akpgeek@

> > wrote:
>
>> We are using postgres 9.0.  When I looked at the pg_stat_activity table.
>>
>> I have some rows where there is difference of 2 hours between
>> backend_start  and xact_start
>>
>> But there is only few milli seconds between xact_start and query_start.
>>
>> All them have wait as false.
>>
>> My question is,  is the query still executing and also why would there be
>> that much time difference between backend_start  and xact_start
>>
>
> Say I connect to the database, and then I go to lunch for 2 hours.  Then I
> come back and start a transaction.
>
> Or, I connect to the database and run a two-hour query.  Then
> rollback/commit that, and I start another transaction.
>
> To know the state of the query, look at the "current_query"  field.  (In
> newer versions, look in "state" field, but that is not in 9.0)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff

Or more commonly (I think at least) connection pools that keep connections
open.  Not sure but I don't think a session reset clears the back-end time
so this would be the observed behavior.

David J.





--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-stat-activity-tp5798382p5798390.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: COPY v. java performance comparison
Next
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY v. java performance comparison