Re: adding partitioned tables to publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date
Msg-id 13925.1585977907@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 03/04/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But the forked-off children have to write the gcov files independently,
>> don't they?

> Hmm that's very good point. I did see these missing coverage issue when 
> running tests that explicitly start more instances of postgres before 
> though. And with some quick googling, parallel testing seems to be issue 
> with gcov for more people.

I poked around and found this:

https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-help/2005-11/msg00074.html

which says

    gcov instrumentation is multi-process safe, but not multi-thread
    safe. The multi-processing safety relies on OS level file locking,
    which is not available on some systems.

That would explain why it works for me, but then there's a question
of why it doesn't work for you ...

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch