Jason Long-2 wrote
> Does the syntax you showed me have performance benefits vs joining a
> bunch of views together?
As a general rule CTE/WITH is going to be worse performing than the
equivalent view definition - depending on the view is actually used in the
query of course. They both have their place. A CTE/WITH is basically a
per-query VIEW though there is an optimization barrier that doesn't allow
the main query WHERE clause to limit the queries like it a view would
normally allow if possible. Because of this I'll occasionally find need to
specify redundant where clauses inside the CTE to get decent performance on
large tables - mostly for my interactive queries.
David J.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-left-join-when-moving-a-column-to-another-table-tp5760187p5760255.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
