Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Somebody needs to figure out whether we are supposed to be using
>> pgsymlink on Cygwin.
> According to port.h:
> * Cygwin has its own symlinks which work on Win95/98/ME where
> * junction points don't, so use it instead. We have no way of
> * knowing what type of system Cygwin binaries will be run on.
> So it looks like we should not be using pgsymlink() on Cygwin, unless we
> declare that these platforms under Cygwin are no longer supported.
Fair enough; Cygwin is kind of a legacy port at this point anyway, so
we shouldn't be doing anything to reduce its backwards compatibility.
I'll fix dirmod.c to match port.h.
regards, tom lane
