Re: Schema version management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Schema version management
Date
Msg-id 1342041031-sup-4511@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema version management  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Schema version management
Re: Schema version management
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 11 17:03:03 -0400 2012:
>
> On tis, 2012-07-10 at 17:54 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > In general, NTFS forbids the use of these printable ASCII chars in
> > filenames (see
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename#Comparison_of_filename_limitations>:
> >
> > " * : < > ? \ / |
>
> > Many of these could be used in operators.
>
> Yeah, that's a bummer.  Then I guess some escape mechanism would be OK.
> I could imagine an operator < on a custom data type being dumped into a
> file named operator_%3C.sql.  Still better than putting them all in one
> file.
>
> Of course, argument types need to be dealt with as well, just like with
> functions (plus prefix/postfix).

operator_!___numeric.sql (postfix, name does not need escape)
operator_%7C%2F_integer__.sql (prefix)
operator_%3C_bit_varying__bit_varying.sql (type name with spaces,
changed to _)

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: emacs configuration for new perltidy settings