Re: Schema version management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Schema version management
Date
Msg-id 1342040583.2712.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema version management  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Schema version management
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2012-07-10 at 17:54 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> In general, NTFS forbids the use of these printable ASCII chars in 
> filenames (see 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename#Comparison_of_filename_limitations>:
> 
> " * : < > ? \ / |

> Many of these could be used in operators.

Yeah, that's a bummer.  Then I guess some escape mechanism would be OK.
I could imagine an operator < on a custom data type being dumped into a
file named operator_%3C.sql.  Still better than putting them all in one
file.

Of course, argument types need to be dealt with as well, just like with
functions (plus prefix/postfix).



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework