On tis, 2012-03-20 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. I bet it thinks that PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY is the variable
> name, which means that the behavior might be more exciting for
> multi-word type names (for instance "struct foo" or "volatile int *".
> Could you check a few cases like that?
Tested, doesn't make a difference. Hence committed that way.