On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:19 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
<snip>
> But before working on this, I want to make sure this won't be a
> useless effort. So I guess I would like to have a final decision on
> this. Do we decide to drop Slony support in 1.14, or do we decide that
> I can work on it, fix it, add support for 2.0, etc.?
<Talk is cheap for me. All I can do is testing.>
...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that
helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as
possible.
So, if it is not too much effort, I'd say we need to support Slony.
Cheers,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
