On sön, 2010-12-26 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We did clean up C++ keyword uses in the header files in 9.0, but your
> report shows it's already gotten broken again. I'm disinclined to fix
> it unless someone steps up to create an automated test that will get
> run reasonably often. We had that discussion when the patch to rename
> keyword-named fields was proposed, and nothing got done, and the
> current state of affairs is the entirely predictable result.
src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck
What's missing is to automate this, but it's unclear in what context,
and perhaps also to what extend this should be a hard requirement.
