Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id 1287342229.30052.1.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 10:00 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> 
> > 3. Somehow deprecate floating point timestamps or make them unusable in
> > conjunction with Range Types. I'm not sure if there is demand to keep
> > them alive or not.
> 

This seems the best solution. We finally got around to making
--integer-datetimes the default in 8.4.

The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.

JD


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums