Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id 14179.1287347262@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.

Red Hat switched to integer datetimes as of 8.4 ... just like upstream.
Please don't imagine that you can complain that Red Hat is behind the
curve on that.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types