Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id 1287354132.12624.1.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 16:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> > configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.
> 
> Red Hat switched to integer datetimes as of 8.4 ... just like upstream.
> Please don't imagine that you can complain that Red Hat is behind the
> curve on that.

I wasn't imagining please don't get your boxers in a bunch. I was
misinformed and I apologize. 

JD

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums