Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimTbnHjxOd_tVFFd2QW4V_LVA6MiFAQwdUwktH3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.
>

If only we knew someone in Redhat :)

iirc the issue was binary upgrades. So I suspect the answer will be
"the next time we break pg_upgrade and require a dump/reload". This is
the cost we chose to pay for binary upgrades.

-- 
greg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types