Excerpts from Scott Marlowe's message of dom jun 20 16:13:15 -0400 2010:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have been wondering if anyone has been experimenting with "really
> > agressive"
> > autovacuuming.
>
> I have been using moderately aggressive autovac, with 6 or more
> threads running with 1ms sleep, then keeping track of them to see if
> they're being too aggresive. Basically as long as io utilization
> doesn't hit 100% it doesn't seem to have any negative or even
> noticeable effect.
Keep in mind that autovacuum scales down the cost limit the more workers
there are. So if you have 10ms sleeps and 1 worker, it should roughly
use a similar amount of I/O than if you have 10ms sleeps and 10 workers
(each worker would sleep 10 times more frequently).
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
