Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Date
Msg-id 1272727007.4161.23413.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Responses Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:

> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server

That's part of the procedure already.

We need something better for the future, though not sure if there's any
small tweaks worth making for 9.0 right now. Let's start making wider
plans for next release.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta