Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Date
Msg-id 4434.1272731845@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
>> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
>> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server

> That's part of the procedure already.

Where is this test procedure documented?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Protecting against case where shmget says EINVAL instead of EEXIST
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby