Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Date
Msg-id 1272732991.4161.24016.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> >> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> >> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
> 
> > That's part of the procedure already.
> 
> Where is this test procedure documented?

In src/test/regress/standby_schedule

hs_standby_check.sql throws warning if not setup correctly.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby