On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 23:00 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> There's no equivalent of XLogArchivingActive()?
> >
> >> XLogArchivingMode() == false enables us to skip WAL-logging in
> >> operations like CLUSTER or COPY, which is a big optimization. I don't
> >> see anything like that in Hot Standby. There is a few small things that
> >> could be skipped, but nothing noticeable.
> >
> > Huh? Surely HS requires XLogArchivingMode as a prerequisite ...
>
> Oh, sure! But there's no switch that needs to be enabled in the master
> in addition to that.
We've tried hard to have it "just work". But I wonder whether we should
have a parameter to allow performance testing on the master? If nobody
finds any issues then we can remove it again, or at least make it a
hidden developer option.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
