Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> There's no equivalent of XLogArchivingActive()?
>
>> XLogArchivingMode() == false enables us to skip WAL-logging in
>> operations like CLUSTER or COPY, which is a big optimization. I don't
>> see anything like that in Hot Standby. There is a few small things that
>> could be skipped, but nothing noticeable.
>
> Huh? Surely HS requires XLogArchivingMode as a prerequisite ...
Oh, sure! But there's no switch that needs to be enabled in the master
in addition to that.
> (Do we have a list of open issues somewhere, so that this
> won't get forgotten?)
I'm keeping one as I bump into things. I'll post it again soon.
Actually, I should probably put it on the wiki.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
