On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 09:37 -0400, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote (in part):
> > Also, I'd just like to mention that vi is a much better editor than
> > emacs.
> That is not my impression. I have used vi from when it first came out (I
> used ed before that) until about 1998 when I first installed Linux on one of
> my machines and started using emacs. I find that for some tasks involving
> global editing, that vi is a lot easier to use. But for most of the things I
> do on a regular basis, if find emacs better. So, for me, it is not which is
> the better editor, but which is the better editor for the task at hand.
Both vi and emacs are obsolete. Bow before the glory of gedit!
