Hi Jean-David,
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:37 +0200, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote (in part):
>
> > Also, I'd just like to mention that vi is a much better editor than
> > emacs.
> >
> That is not my impression. I have used vi from when it first came out (I
> used ed before that) until about 1998 when I first installed Linux on one of
> my machines and started using emacs. I find that for some tasks involving
> global editing, that vi is a lot easier to use. But for most of the things I
> do on a regular basis, if find emacs better. So, for me, it is not which is
> the better editor, but which is the better editor for the task at hand.
You are probably absolutely right, but Robert only wanted to point out
that this conversation gets in the flame-war direction, in his subtle
way of doing this...
Cheers,
Csaba.
