Re: White paper on very big databases - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: White paper on very big databases
Date
Msg-id 1233950856.15061.59.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: White paper on very big databases  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 21:23 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
>         Well therein lies the problem. CMD has a customer with a
>         multi-terrabyte
>         table (not including the rest of the database) but we can't
>         really talk
>         about it :(
>
> IIRC, EnterpriseDB had one customer with over 1TB of data, but they
> too would have been hush-hush about it.  When I was consulting, I saw
> very few Postgres databases at or over 1TB.  While Postgres can handle
> fairly large data sets, it lacks some fairly important VLDB features
> which is probably why there are so few people with multi-terabyte PG
> databases.  Perhaps JD/Fetter know of more, but I can count the ones I
> know of at < 10.

I know of a lot more than that.

Joshua D. Drake

>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: White paper on very big databases
Next
From: Thomas Finneid
Date:
Subject: weaknesses and strenghts of PG