Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date
Msg-id 1229869.1711160593@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> . o O ( int64_t, PRIdi64, etc were standardised a quarter of a century ago )

Yeah.  Now that we require C99 it's probably reasonable to assume
that those things exist.  I wouldn't be in favor of ripping out our
existing notations like UINT64CONST, because the code churn would be
substantial and the gain minimal.  But we could imagine reimplementing
that stuff atop <stdint.h> and then getting rid of the configure-time
probes.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sublink [exists (select xxx group by grouping sets ())] causes an assertion error
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: session username in default psql prompt?