Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+CR05ACFujUbeAd-yM+nNJBSpnyB=q3vbriCJuoSu9Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> conftest.c:139:5: error: no previous prototype for 'does_int64_work' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>   139 | int does_int64_work()
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> configure:17003: $? = 1
> configure: program exited with status 1

. o O ( int64_t, PRIdi64, etc were standardised a quarter of a century ago )



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: sublink [exists (select xxx group by grouping sets ())] causes an assertion error