Re: Wisconsin benchmark - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Wisconsin benchmark
Date
Msg-id 12090.1250275250@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Wisconsin benchmark  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wisconsin benchmark  (Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>)
Re: Wisconsin benchmark  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> The Wisconsin Benchmark in src/test/bench is broken, probably since 8.2.

Again?  :-(

> Attached is a tested patch that fixes it.  However, it might be better
> to just remove src/test/bench.

I tend to agree with this opinion.  That benchmark is obsolete to the
point of having zero connection to the modern world; which is why we
keep not noticing when it's busted.  Anyone want to argue for keeping it
in our sources?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: More cruft left behind in doc directory