Re: Question for Postgres 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Question for Postgres 8.3
Date
Msg-id 12084.1202179118@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Question for Postgres 8.3  (Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Question for Postgres 8.3
Re: Question for Postgres 8.3
List pgsql-general
Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp> writes:
> * Disallow database encodings that are inconsistent with the server's
> locale setting (Tom)

> does this mean, if my server LOCALE is for example UTF-8.en_US, and I want
> to create a EUC_JP database it gets rejected? do I missunderstand that?

Nope, you have it correctly.

> Normaly my servers have default locale set to UTF-8.en_US but also have the
> locales for UTF-8.ja_JP and EUC_JP there, 99.9% of my databases are utf-8,
> but I have some clients that created EUC_JP databases, will the upgrade
> affect this?

I'm surprised your clients haven't been screaming about bogus sorting
and upper/lowercasing behavior.

If you want to support multiple encodings, the only safe locale choice
is (and always has been) C.  If you doubt this, troll the archives for
awhile --- for example, searching for locale+encoding in pgsql-bugs
should provide plenty of amusing reading matter.  8.3 is just refusing
to do things that are known to be unsafe in previous releases.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reload only specific databases from pg_dumpall
Next
From: Clemens Schwaighofer
Date:
Subject: Re: Question for Postgres 8.3