> > I don't like that --- seems it would put a definite crimp in the
> > whole point of TOAST, which is not to have arbitrary limits on field
> > sizes.
>
> If we can solve it, let's do so. If we cannot, let's restrict
> it for 7.1.
How are you doing the index toasting currently ? Is it on the same
line as table toasting ? That is: toast some index column values if the key
exceeds 2k ?
Andreas
