Re: Postgresql simple query performance question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH
Subject Re: Postgresql simple query performance question
Date
Msg-id 116809.21279.qm@web31103.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgresql simple query performance question  (SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,
The table has 43 columns. I have attached the columns-list.They have many char() and numeric columns.
For the table size, these are the corresponding entries from the pg_class
foo is the table and the others are some of its indexes.

relname                 reltuples     relpages
 foo                      2.9384E7      825699     
 foo_idx_pat         2.9384E7      684995     
 foo_idx_service   2.9384E7      433549     
 foo_idx_serv       2.9384E7      433435     
 foo_pk                 2.9384E7      109057     

Thanks
Sharmila

----- Original Message ----
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 8:03:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql simple query performance question

"SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH" <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com> writes:

> I understand that. But why is that when oracle is given a hint to do full
> table scan instead of using index to get the count, it is still faster than
> postgres when both has the same explain plan? Oracle takes 34 sec and
> postgres takes 1 m10 sec . Is there anything that can be done in postgresql
> for speeding this up?

How large are the actual respective data files?

What are the columns in these tables? Do you have many char() and NUMERIC
columns?

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: rihad
Date:
Subject: Re: prepared statements suboptimal?
Next
From: "Peter Cai"
Date:
Subject: Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?